Browning’s Dramatic Monologue
Robert Browning aspired to be a dramatist. He
wrote eight dramas and all of them
failed on the
stage. Browning’s genius was contemplating than dramatic. Its main reason was that neither Browning was so
mature for writing a drama nor was his audience. Browning made a
practical compromise and decided to write the drama of the soul –dramatic monologue. This drama is acted within the mind of
the character. It is not projected on the stage of a theatre.
So, Browning interiorized the drama.
Dramatic monologue is
different from a drama and a soliloquy. In drama the action is external but
in dramaticmonologue, the action is internal and his soul is the stage. In
a soliloquy, only one character speaks to himself and there is no interference of any
other character but in a monologue,
one character speaks his mind and thecharacter is listening to
him, but he is not interfering in the action.
Victorianism was an
age of renaissance. It was an age when British colonies were being forced.
British Empire was reducing to England. So people were very much disturbed. The
whole of the England was in a state of crisis. There was also a restriction of the people that they could not discuss this
issue with others in public places. So there was a conflict in the
minds of the people and they were thinking in their minds of the
people. They were thinking and talking only to themselves.
Browning wanted
to present all this on the stage but in this period of gloominess it was not
possible for him to stage a drama. Even the intellectuals were not allowed to
write on critical issues of the country. Browningthought a very clever
device and decided to write dramatic monologue. This was exactly
the situation of the people that they had a drama in their minds but
they could not express it. So they were only talking to
themselves. Browning did not directly write about England rather he
picked up the same situation of Italian Renaissance, some 200 years earlier, in
Italy. At that time Italy was passing through the same critical situation as it
was in the England in Browning’s times.
In this period every
Englishman was suffering from a critical situation. Every individual was thinking
about the past glory of the England, there was a conflict in his mind. He was
thinking about his present and past. His soul was in confusion, he was thinking
about the causes of this failure, he tried to give some justifications and
everyone had a sense of optimism in his mind though that might not be a false
one.
So we see that
Browning’s characters are also representing the same situation of English
people and the pessimism of the age.
Browning’s dramatic monologue deals
with the subject of failure. He takes a character who has been failed
in his life. He is caught up in crisis and now tells his story of crisis and
bores out his soul before us. The last rider, Fra Lippo Lippi, Bishop at his death bed and Andrea are
the typical example of this kind. Fra Lippo Lippi has been caught up in an area
of prostitutes:
I am poor brother Lippo, by your leave!
You need not clap your torches to my face.
You need not clap your torches to my face.
The last rider has been rejected by his beloved:
I said – Then, dearest, since ’tis so,
Since now at length my fate I know,
Since now at length my fate I know,
Bishop is on his bed:
Vanity, saith the preacher, vanity!
Draw round my bed: is Anselm keeping back?
Draw round my bed: is Anselm keeping back?
And Andrea’s wife does not care for him.
But do not let us quarrel any more,
No, my Lucrezia; bear with me for once:
No, my Lucrezia; bear with me for once:
So, we see that
Browning’s characters are in a conflict, they are in a critical situation and
they now try to cope up with their situation.
To deal out with
this situation Browning presents the whole of his
case. Browning shows us the past and present of
his character and how this character gets involved in this
critical situation. So Browning unfolds the whole of the life of
his character to make it possible to analyze the history of
the character. This is Browning’s technique of case-making. The stronger
is the case, the interesting will be the poem.
Through the
technique of case-making, browning dissects the soul of
his character and this technique of soul dissection helps the reader
to understand the character and clearly see why
his character reaches to this critical juncture.
We know that Fra was
poor in his childhood and the guardian church was very strict with him. He had
been suppressed adversely in his life.
And I’ve been three weeks shut within my mew,
A – painting for the great man, saints and saints
And saints again. I could not paint all night –
A – painting for the great man, saints and saints
And saints again. I could not paint all night –
The last rider could not express his love to his beloved and won her.
– And this beside, if you will not blame,
Your leave for one more last ride with me.
Your leave for one more last ride with me.
The bishop had been a worldly man and jealous of Gandolf.
And so, abut his tomb of mine. I fought
With tooth and nail to save my niche, ye known:
With tooth and nail to save my niche, ye known:
Andrea deceived the French King, who was very kind to him.
… … … … … … … … God is just.
King Francis may forgive me: … … …
King Francis may forgive me: … … …
To conclude,
Browning’s business is to render the soul or psyche of his protagonists and so
he follows the same technique as the modern impressionist. With the help of the
technique of soul dissection, we clearly see the soul of the character. In
his monologues, Browning constantly strikes a curiously modern note.
Robert Browning - Optimism
Browning is
an optimist, and as an optimist, he is a moralist and a religious teacher. He
holds a very distinct place among the writers of the VictorianAge. He is
an uncompromising foe of “Scientific Materialism”. He preaches God and
universality as the central truth of his philosophy of life.
Victorian Age is a watershed age in English literature. As there is the influence of Classicism, Italian Renaissance, British Renaissance, Individualism, Socialism, Utilitarianism, Neo-Classicism, Romanticism, Modernism and Scepticism.
Therefore, there are a lot of confusions and conflicts in this age. There are the conflicts between art and life, art and morality, content and form, man and woman, classic education and progressive education, flesh and spirit, body and soul and what not.
In this entire
prevailed situation, Browning remains unaffected by these confusions
and conflicts. He is at heart an optimist. His optimism is clear even in his
style of writing a poem that he always picks up his central character
in crisis or in some critical situation, then this crisis reaches the climax
and ultimately resolved and he ends his poem with optimism. As in his poem
“Patriot into Traitor”, he says:
’Tis
God shall repay one, I am safer so.
As in “Fra Lippo Lippi”, he says:
Don’t
fear me! There is the grey beginning. Zooks!
Browning is a very consistent
thinker of optimistic philosophy of life. His poetry has immense
variety, but his unchanging philosophical view of human destiny gives unity to
it. He does not challenge the old dogmas. He accepts the conventional view of
God, the immortality of the soul, and the Christian belief in incarnation.
Browning’s optimism is founded on the realities of life. It is not ‘blind’ as he does not shut his eyes to the evil prevailing in daily life routine. He knows that human life is a mixture of good and evil, of love and the ugliness, of despair and hopefulness, but he derives hope from this very imperfection of life. His optimism “is founded on imperfections of man”. In the famous lines of “Pippa Passes”, he says:
God is in his Heaven –
All is right with the world!
All is right with the world!
Browning believes that experience
leads to enrichment. His attitude towards evil, pain and misery is not merely
abstract. He does not accept evil merely as a practical instrument of human
advancement. His approach is pragmatic as it is based on the actual experience
of life. He tests every theory on the touchstone of
pragmatism. Browning believes that it is not achievement, but it is
struggle that empowers man in life.
His optimism is based on his theory of evolution that life is constantly progressing to higher and higher levels. Man progresses in the moral and spiritual sense through persistent struggle against evil. He says that evil is our foe, and no victory is possible over the foe. Evil is the opportunity offered to us by the divine power to advance spirituality.
Evil
is, therefore, a way of man’s moral progress.
Browning believes
that this life is a preparation for the life to come. In “Evelyn
Hope”, the lover does not despair as he derives consolation from the optimistic
faith that “God creates the love to reward the love”. True love is sure to be
rewarded in the life after death, if not in this life.
Browning’s optimism is firmly based on his faith in the immortality of the soul. The body may die but the soul lives on in the Infinite. Life, in the other world, is far more valuable than life in this finite world. This ideal which is attainable here is worthless, for by attaining it here, we shall not deserve to attain it there in the next world.
Browning believes in the futility of this worldly life. He thinks that failure serves as a source of inspiration for progress as in “Andrea Del Sarto”:
Ah, but a man’s reach should exceed his grasp,
Or what’s heaven for?
Or what’s heaven for?
Browning’s
firm faith in God is beyond any doubt. He is never sceptical about the existence
of God controlling the world. Even his knaves have firm faith in God, and
rely upon His mercy. They constantly talk of their relation with God, and are
sure of their ultimate union with Him. It is love which harmonizes all living
beings. It is on love that all Browning’s characters build their faith saying:
God,
Thou art Love I build my faith on that
Life in this world is worth living
because both life and the world are the expressions of Divine Love. The world
is beautiful as God created it out of the fullness of His love.
… …This world’s no blot for us,
Not blank; it means intensely, and means good:
Not blank; it means intensely, and means good:
Browning’s optimism finds the passion
of joy no one has sung more fervently than Browning of the delight of life.
David in “Saul”, Pippa in “Pippa Passes”, Lippo in “Fra Lippo Lippi” and a host
of other poems are keenly alive to the pleasure of living. The Rabbi in “Rabbi
Ben Ezra” condemns the aesthetic negation of the flesh, and asserts the
necessity and moral usefulness of the flesh and the soul:
As the bird wings and sings,
Let us cry ‘All good things
Are ours, nor soul helps flesh more, now, than flesh helps soul’
Let us cry ‘All good things
Are ours, nor soul helps flesh more, now, than flesh helps soul’
So, we can safely conclude
the Browning speaks out the strongest words of optimistic faith in
his Victorian Age of scepticism and pessimism. Of all English poets, no other
is so completely, so consciously, so magnificently a teacher of man as
is Browning. However, according to modern criticism, in certain
cases, Browning’s optimism can be interpreted as false or hollow optimism.
Sometimes, it seems a justification of failure than optimism; it seems a hope
against hope or a hope for the impossible.
As in “Andrea Del Sarto”, he says:
… … … What would one have?
In heaven, perhaps, new chances, one more chance–
In heaven, perhaps, new chances, one more chance–
As in “The Bishop Orders His
Tomb”, he says:
Old Gandolf, at me, from his onion–stone,
As still he envied me, so fair she was!
As still he envied me, so fair she was!
As in “The Last Ride Together”, he
says:
So, one day more am I deified.
Who knows but the world may end to–night?
Who knows but the world may end to–night?
On another place, he says:
I hoped
she would love me; here we ride.
Again at the end of this very poem he
says:
The instant made eternity, –
And heaven just prove that in and she
Ride, ride together, for ever ride?
And heaven just prove that in and she
Ride, ride together, for ever ride?
Despite, all this we call him as an
optimist because of his firm faith in God.
His poems are full of courage and inspiration, telling people that there are no difficulties if they have self-dependence and self-control. It was a good omen for English literature that the two leaders in Poetry, Tennyson and Browning differed from on another. Tennyson was at heart a pessimist. But Browning was at heart a strong optimist.
Robert Browning: Obscurity
Much ink has been spilt in proving and
disproving that Browning is an obscure poet. It is hard to absolve Browning of
the charge of unintelligibility and difficulty. In his own age, he was
considered very difficult and obscure and hence could not achieved popularity
and recognition like his contemporary Tennyson. “Sordellow” was regarded as
more obscure than any other poem in the English language. Mrs. Carlyle read the
poem and could not judge whether ‘Sordellow’ was a man, or a city, or a book.
Douglas Jerrold, after reading it said:
My God! I am an idiot. My health is restored, but my mind
is gone.
Browning certainly is a very difficult
poet. Dawson calls him “the Carlyle of poetry”. Various reasons are given for
the obscurity and difficulty of his poetry. According to some critics,
obscurity of Browning’s poetry is
… a piece of intellectual vanity indulged in more and
more insolently as his years and fame increased.
But as Chesterton points out:
All the records of Browning’s long life and caret show
that he was at all vain. All his contemporaries agree that he never talked
cleverly or tried to talk cleverly which is always the case with a man who is
intellectually vain. It is psychologically improbable that the poet, made his
poems, complicated from mere pride of his powers and contempt of his readers.
According to the learned critic:
Browning was not unintelligible because he was proud, but
unintelligible because he was humble.
He was humble enough to think that what
he knew was quite commonplace and was known even to the man in the street. His
own concepts were quite clear to him that he found nothing difficult or
profound in them.
It is fantastic, it is grotesque, and it
is enigmatic but there is nothing philosophical about it. Browning is not
obscure because he is philosophical poet; the real reasons of his obscurity lie
elsewhere. In the passage in question, the obscurity arises from Browning’s use
of the unfamiliar and unusual ‘Murex’, the key-word in the passage and
essential for its understanding. More other than not, the key-word in a passage
is missing and so it becomes dark and obscure.
Obscurity in Browning’s poetry results
not from any one reason but from a number of reasons.
Browning had a very high conception of
his own calling. He once wrote to a friend:
I never designedly tried to puzzle people as some of my
critics have supposed.
He believed that a poet should try to
put “the infinite within the finite”. It is not a kind of poetry to be read
merely to while way a leisure hour.
Browning was a highly original genius
and his poetry was entirely different from contemporaries.
Browning’s dramatic monologues are soul
studies; they study the shifting moods and changing thoughts of a developing
soul. It is always soul dissection, it is thought, thought and thought; and
thought all the way. It is always “interior landscape” with no chronology or background.
Obviously such poetry is bound to be difficult. Browning’s long, argumentative
and philosophical poems are tiresome and boring.
This difficulty of comprehension is
further increased by the fact that he was interested in the queerest human
soul, and tried to probe the odd and the abnormal in human psychology. “He
sought the sinners whom even the sinners had cast out”, and tried to show that
even they might be generous and humane. He tried to reveal the essential
nobility and humanity even of a mean impostor.
Browning was a very learned poet. His
schooling was mostly private and so his learning was more profound and thorough
than of those who have been educated at school. He knew in detail the history
and geography not of one country, but of a number of countries. Many of his
poems require knowledge of medieval history and of Italian history.
There is frequent use of Latin
expressions and quotations; there are illusions to little known literary,
mythological, historical sources and information of Medieval and Renaissance
art and culture of Europe. Browning sought his object in many lands.
Often Browning’s metaphors, similes and
illustrations are far-fetched and recondite as in “Two in the Campagna” and in
“Memorabilia”.
Often Browning’s writes a telegraphic
style. Relative, prepositions, articles, even pronouns are left out. It might
be that his pen failed to keep pace with the rush of his ideas, but such
telegraphic style is certainly confusing and bewildering for his readers.
Browning’s frequent inversions and the
use of long, involved sentences, heavily overloaded with parentheses, create
almost insurmountable difficulties in the way of his readers. In poems like
“The Grammarian’s Funeral”, he not only buries the grammarian but also grammar.
Frequently, he coins new words, uses
unusual compounds and expressions and is too colloquial, jerky, abrupt and
rugged.
When his “Sordellow” first appeared, he
was accused of verbosity and since then he made it his rule to use only two
words where ten were needed. He admits this complexity of his poetry in “Rabbi
Ben Ezra”.
Thoughts hardly, to be packed
Into a narrow act,
Fancies that broke through language and escaped;
However, the obscurity of Browning’s
poetry must not be exaggerated. As Duffin, points out, the majority of
Browning’s shorter poems are read as easily as the verse of Tennyson. Poems
like “Evelyn Hope”, “The Last Rise Together”, “The Patriot”, “Prophyria’s
Lover”, “Prospice”, “My Last Duchess”, “Home Thoughts, from Abroad” etc are
perfectly lucid and simple. The intelligent reader can enjoy most of his lyrics
and longer poems in blank verse after a little mental adjustment. Even in these
thorniest poems there are passages of great originality and eloquence of
classical beauty and easy comprehension.
0 Comments